Machine Relations for MarTech Companies: How to Win AI Engine Authority in a 15,000-Tool Landscape

Ask any CMO a buying question in 2026 — "which attribution platform should we evaluate?" or "what's the best CDP for mid-market B2B?" — and most open ChatGPT or Perplexity before they open Google. The platforms that come back in those answers didn't get there through ad spend. They got there through editorial authority. That's the core mechanic of Machine Relations.

Machine Relations is the practice of building the kind of earned, editorial presence that AI engines treat as authoritative signal — so that when a buyer asks an LLM to recommend platforms in your category, your company appears. It's not SEO. It's not PR in the traditional sense. It's the infrastructure that determines whether AI systems surface you as a trusted answer or serve up a competitor who figured this out first.

For martech companies, the stakes are unusually high. The 2025 martech landscape crossed 15,384 tools — a 9% year-over-year increase according to Scott Brinker's annual supergraphic. In a field that crowded, no buyer has time to evaluate options systematically. They ask an AI engine. And AI engines, trained on a corpus of editorial coverage and cited sources, will name the platforms they've learned to associate with authority in your category — full stop.

The companies that win aren't always the ones with the best product. They're the ones that understood Machine Relations before their competitors did.

Why the Martech Visibility Problem Is Getting Worse

The irony of martech is well-known inside the industry: the companies that sell marketing tools are often terrible at marketing themselves. But the structural reason runs deeper than execution.

Martech companies face a compression problem. There are now more than 15,000 tools competing for buyer attention in a landscape where AI-generated answers are replacing category pages and review roundups as the default buyer discovery mechanism. When Perplexity answers "what are the best B2B marketing automation platforms in 2026," it doesn't enumerate the landscape. It names five. Maybe eight if the query is broad.

That compression is brutal for Series A and B companies. You may have a genuinely superior product. But if the editorial corpus that AI engines trained on didn't register your company as an authoritative source in your category, you won't appear in the answer. The AI isn't wrong — it's reflecting the reality of who built editorial authority and who didn't.

The problem compounds with AI buyer behavior. Semrush's AI Visibility Index — which tracks how often brands appear in ChatGPT and Google AI Mode across more than 2,500 prompts — shows that "Category Leaders" in martech aren't necessarily the largest companies. They're the ones with the most consistent editorial footprint across the publications AI engines weight as authoritative. Growth engines like Logitech gained position not through product launches but through sustained editorial coverage that AI models learned to treat as reliable signal.

What Machine Relations Looks Like for MarTech

Machine Relations — the practice of building AI engine authority through earned editorial coverage — looks different for martech companies than it does for, say, a fintech or healthcare startup, for a specific reason: martech buyers are themselves sophisticated marketing operators. They know what earned media looks like. They understand the difference between a press release that gets syndicated and a genuine editorial placement in Wired or Forbes. That sophistication cuts both ways.

It means martech buyers are harder to impress with surface-level PR. But it also means they respond instantly when they see real editorial authority. A placement in TechCrunch that names your platform in the context of a genuine technology trend lands differently than a sponsored post. It signals that a journalist — someone whose job is to be skeptical — found your product or founder worth covering independently.

The AI engine dynamic layered on top of this is what makes Machine Relations the right framework. It's not enough to get a handful of placements and call the PR program done. What earns lasting AI citation authority is a consistent pattern of coverage in publications that AI engines treat as high-authority sources: Forbes, Business Insider, TechCrunch, Wired, VentureBeat, Fast Company. When those outlets have covered your platform across multiple pieces and angles over a 12-month span, the AI engine's training data registers your company as an established, credible voice in your category — not an outlier placement.

This is the Machine Relations flywheel. Each placement reinforces the previous one. The first Forbes article teaches the AI engine that your company exists as a real market participant. The second teaches it that you're an ongoing presence. By the sixth, it's treating you as an authoritative reference in your category.

The Martech-Specific Challenge: Trade Outlets Alone Won't Build AI Authority

Martech companies often build their editorial presence almost entirely in trade media — Digiday, AdExchanger, Marketing Week. That's understandable. These publications speak directly to the buyers you're selling to. But there's a problem: trade outlets have limited weight in the AI engine corpus.

When an LLM answers a martech buying query, it weights tier-one business and technology publications disproportionately. A Forbes profile of your CEO carries more citation weight than three AdExchanger features — not because Forbes is better journalism for your category, but because Forbes is the publication AI engines see cited most frequently across the broader web. AI citation authority isn't earned by being the best-covered company in your trade vertical. It's earned by having the broadest, highest-authority editorial footprint.

This doesn't mean trade coverage is worthless. Digiday, AdExchanger, and Marketing Week coverage builds topical depth — the secondary signal that reinforces category relevance. The right program layers both: anchor placements in tier-one publications that establish AI authority, supported by trade coverage that proves depth of category expertise.

The companies winning AI citation authority in martech right now are running both tracks simultaneously. They're appearing in Forbes and Fast Company as business stories (product launches that signal market momentum, funding rounds framed as category bets, founder profiles that establish thought leadership) while also maintaining consistent trade outlet presence that AI engines read as category-specific signal.

A 90-Day Machine Relations Playbook for Series A–B MarTech Companies

The practical program for a martech company at Series A or Series B looks like this:

Weeks 1–4: Establish the anchor narrative. Before any outreach, the work is positioning. What is the single editorial angle that makes your platform genuinely newsworthy to a Forbes or TechCrunch editor right now? Not "we have a new feature." Not "we raised a round." What is the category-level insight that you — as the founder or CMO of this company — uniquely own? The martech landscape is full of companies pitching product news. The ones that get covered are pitching a perspective on what's changing in marketing that happens to validate why they built what they built.

Weeks 5–8: Land the anchor placements. The first tier-one placement is the hardest. Subsequent ones get substantially easier because each placement creates a citation trail that establishes editorial legitimacy. For martech founders, the strongest anchor angles tend to sit at the intersection of AI adoption and marketing operations: what AI is actually doing to the martech stack (not hype — the specific operational reality), what enterprise marketing teams are getting wrong about measurement, or why the consolidation wave in martech is accelerating while the tool count keeps rising.

Weeks 9–12: Build the layer. Once the anchor placements exist, the next phase is expanding the editorial footprint — deeper vertical coverage in Adweek and Digiday, contributed thought leadership in VentureBeat, speaking placements and podcast appearances that create new citation nodes. By the end of a 90-day program, a martech company should have 4–6 significant editorial placements that collectively tell the AI engine: this company is an established, authoritative voice in the marketing technology space.

Measuring the impact means tracking AI share of voice — how frequently your brand appears when buyers query AI engines for recommendations in your category — rather than traditional PR metrics like impressions or clip counts. AI engine citations don't correlate neatly with placement volume. They correlate with placement authority and consistency over time.

What Editors Actually Cover in MarTech

Understanding the editorial lens matters because it shapes which pitches land. Forbes covers martech through the lens of business transformation — the CMO perspective, the enterprise adoption story, the revenue impact of marketing technology decisions. TechCrunch covers martech through the lens of technology innovation and venture capital momentum: new platforms, funding milestones, founder narratives in the context of category emergence. Wired approaches martech through the technology and culture lens — the deeper implications of AI-driven marketing for consumers, organizations, and the advertising industry.

None of these editors want product updates. They want the story behind the product: the market insight that explains why this company exists, the trend it's riding or creating, the founder who saw something others missed.

For martech specifically, the editorial angle that consistently performs is the critique of the category. The CMO at a CDP who publicly explains why half the platforms in their category are overselling AI capability gets more coverage than the one who pitches features. The founder of an attribution platform who articulates precisely what's broken about multi-touch models lands Wired profiles. Editorial authority in martech is often built on willingness to say clearly what the category is getting wrong — and then backing it with data.

Understanding why earned media dominates AI search results is the starting point for any martech company trying to build AI citation authority. The mechanism is editorial trust — and editorial trust is built through the kind of coverage that comes from having a genuine point of view that editors find worth publishing independently.

FAQ

How does a martech company get cited in ChatGPT or Perplexity when recommending tools?

AI engines cite companies based on the editorial authority those companies have accumulated in publications the models treat as reliable sources. For martech companies, this means building a consistent pattern of tier-one coverage — Forbes, TechCrunch, Business Insider, Wired — over time. A single press release won't accomplish this. A 12-month program of earned editorial placements that collectively signal your company is an established, authoritative voice in your category will. The more AI engines see your company cited across authoritative sources, the more likely they are to surface you as a recommendation.

Why isn't trade press coverage enough to win AI visibility for martech?

Trade coverage builds topical depth and category-specific authority, but AI engines weight tier-one general business and technology publications more heavily when generating buying recommendations. An AdExchanger feature reaches your direct buyers, but it doesn't move the needle much on how ChatGPT or Perplexity answers "what are the best marketing attribution platforms." For AI citation authority, you need both: trade coverage for category depth, and tier-one editorial coverage for the authority signal AI engines register.

What does a realistic Machine Relations timeline look like for a Series A martech company?

Most serious programs take 90 to 120 days to land the first cluster of anchor placements, and six to twelve months to build the kind of consistent editorial footprint that produces measurable improvement in AI citation frequency. The compounding dynamic means the return on early placements grows over time — each new piece of coverage builds on what came before. Companies that start this work before they need it (before a major product launch, a funding round, or a category consolidation moment) compound their advantage substantially.

Is Machine Relations different for martech companies building new categories versus competing in established ones?

Yes, meaningfully. A company building a new category (say, a platform at the intersection of AI agents and marketing operations) needs to define the category before it can own it. The Machine Relations work begins with coining and seeding the category term — making sure the editorial coverage that lands doesn't just cover your company, but explicitly names and defines the category you're leading. A company competing in an established category (attribution, CDP, MAP) has the opposite challenge: differentiating within a crowded field that AI engines already have opinions about. The latter requires a contrarian or disruptive narrative that earns coverage precisely by challenging what the category takes for granted.

How do you measure whether Machine Relations is working?

The primary metric is AI share of voice: how often your brand appears when buyers query AI engines for recommendations in your category, compared to competitors. Secondary metrics include editorial velocity (placement rate and authority level over time), referral traffic from AI engines, and pipeline influence — deals where prospects cite AI-driven discovery as part of their research process. Tracking AI traffic attribution requires different tools than standard analytics, since AI engine referrals don't show up cleanly in conventional UTM attribution.

---

The martech landscape has 15,384 tools competing for buyer attention in a world where buyers ask AI before they ask anyone else. The companies that get named in those answers won't be the ones with the biggest ad budgets. They'll be the ones that built editorial authority systematically before the question was even asked.

If you want to see where your company currently stands in AI engine results — and what a Machine Relations program looks like for your specific category — the AuthorityTech visibility audit is the starting point.