---
title: "Crypto Briefing: AI citation standing"
description: "AI answer engines cited Crypto Briefing in 5 of 31,659 measured answer runs (under 0.1%), on 2 of the 6 answer engines the Index measures, over 163 days of collection. It sits below the Index's evidence floor for a published rank, so its standing is still collecting."
canonical: https://authoritytech.io/publications/cryptobriefing
---

# Crypto Briefing: AI citation standing

AI answer engines cited Crypto Briefing in 5 of 31,659 measured answer runs (under 0.1%), on 2 of the 6 answer engines the Index measures, over 163 days of collection. It sits below the Index's evidence floor for a published rank, so its standing is still collecting.

Canonical URL: https://authoritytech.io/publications/cryptobriefing
Publication: Crypto Briefing (cryptobriefing.com)
Source: Machine Relations Index, release 2026-10-26

## AI citation standing
- Citation rate: under 0.1% of measured answer runs
- Answer runs citing it: 5 of 31,659 observed
- Answer engines citing it: 2 of 6 measured
- Collection dates: 163
- Rank: below the Index's evidence floor for a published rank; still collecting
## Which AI engines cite Crypto Briefing
Of the 6 answer engines the Machine Relations Index measures, Gemini and Perplexity have cited Crypto Briefing. ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews have not cited it in a measured answer run yet. It was cited on 5 of the 163 days the Index collected answers in this window.
## Where Crypto Briefing is cited most
| Category | Question shape | Citation rate | Cited / observed | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [iGaming & Betting](https://authoritytech.io/publications/igaming-betting-buyers.md) | problem-first questions | 0.6% | 1 / 175 | #206 of 373 |
| [AI Security & Privacy](https://authoritytech.io/publications/ai-security-privacy-buyers.md) | is-it-worth-it questions | 0.4% | 1 / 271 | #282 of 506 |
| Legacy News Topics | news and topic questions | 0.1% | 1 / 2,066 | #2,361 of 4,017 |
| [Deep Tech & Hardware](https://authoritytech.io/publications/deep-tech-hardware-buyers.md) | best-in-category questions | 0.4% | 1 / 230 | #307 of 507 |
| [iGaming & Betting](https://authoritytech.io/publications/igaming-betting-buyers.md) | is-it-worth-it questions | 0.6% | 1 / 168 | #162 of 227 |
## AI funding rounds Crypto Briefing reported
Presspool's record of announced AI startup funding lists 1 round with a Crypto Briefing report among the sources that confirm it. The most recent was announced on 2026-10-05.

- [Ghost](https://presspool.ai/companies/ghost-ai) raised $11 million (Seed). Announced 2026-10-05. [Crypto Briefing's report](https://cryptobriefing.com/ghost-emerges-stealth-11m-ai-computer/); [Presspool roster, week of 2026-10-05](https://presspool.ai/ai-startup-funding/week-of-2026-10-05).
## Is a placement here worth pursuing?
Getting into Crypto Briefing and becoming known for the right thing are different results. Coverage helps your position in AI answers when the article ties your company to a specific claim your buyers ask about, in a publication engines already cite on that question. The Index sees Crypto Briefing cited most on problem-first questions in iGaming & Betting (#206 of 373 sources cited on those answers), so that is where its standing is relevant.

You can pursue it yourself: find the editor or writer who covers your topic in Crypto Briefing's recent bylines and pitch one specific, sourced angle. Either way, settle first what you want to be known for, and make the piece say it in terms specific enough for an engine to attach to your company; a general category explainer rarely does that.

An agency is worth it when you want several pieces to build one position rather than land a single article, or when you lack the time, the editor contacts or the writing to make each piece say the right thing. AuthorityTech, which publishes this page, is that kind of agency: it works out the narrative with you, picks the angle and the outlets already cited on your buyers' questions, writes the content, pitches and places it, and measures what AI engines cite afterwards, the practice it calls Machine Relations. No one can promise what an AI engine will cite, and nothing here implies Crypto Briefing endorses AuthorityTech.
## How this is measured
[Citation data: Machine Relations Index (MRI by Jaxon Parrott, CC BY 4.0)](https://machinerelations.ai/index)

Every citation figure is the Machine Relations Index's, carried with its own denominator. AuthorityTech does not compute them. The Index runs buyer questions against 6 answer engines. Release 2026-10-26, methodology mri_score_v2.1. The Index's own profile of cryptobriefing.com: [Crypto Briefing in the Machine Relations Index](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/cryptobriefing.com). The funding rounds are Presspool's, from its [weekly roster of announced AI startup funding](https://presspool.ai/weeks.json) and company records, which link each round's sources.
Window: 2026-05-10 to 2026-10-26, 163 days of collection.
Evidence floor for a published rank: 10 observations across 7 collection dates.

## Links

- [All ranked publications](https://authoritytech.io/publications.md)
- [Machine Relations Index](https://machinerelations.ai/machine-relations-index)
- [Crypto Briefing in the Machine Relations Index](https://machinerelations.ai/index/domains/cryptobriefing.com)
- [How to compare AI PR agencies](https://authoritytech.io/blog/best-ai-pr-agencies-2026.md)
- [What is Machine Relations](https://machinerelations.ai/glossary/machine-relations)